Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Sign in to follow this  
alfonsobravo

150 hour proggie..how are these accounts still alive??

Recommended Posts

So I've been browsing multiple premium scripts, and found this proggie along with many others like it

8349481096.jpg%C2%A0

Question is.. how does jagex not catch on to these accounts if you're botting almost a week straight? It's obviously impossible to do as a human.

Is this script just so damn good? Or is the bot detection system flawed? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, alfonsobravo said:

So I've been browsing multiple premium scripts, and found this proggie along with many others like it

8349481096.jpg%C2%A0

Question is.. how does jagex not catch on to these accounts if you're botting almost a week straight? It's obviously impossible to do as a human.

Is this script just so damn good? Or is the bot detection system flawed? 

It's a god damn miracle 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Laniax said:

So it might've taken several weeks for that proggy to form.

That's exactly what I thought at first, but then I realized that the image is not a forum signature, it's the script's paint. Since the game is updated weekly and the client needs to be restarted, the script literary ran for 151 hours out of the weeks' 168 hours. :o

TA9PmfL.png

Although it most likely used breaks which were added to the runtime. If the average hourly profit at Zulrah is 2.7m and that account made 1.7m/h (62%), that account probably ran for ~15 hours / day.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Einstein said:

That's exactly what I thought at first, but then I realized that the image is not a forum signature, it's the script's paint. Since the game is updated weekly and the client needs to be restarted, the script literary ran for 151 hours out of the weeks' 168 hours. :o

TA9PmfL.png

Although it most likely used breaks which were added to the runtime. If the average hourly profit at Zulrah is 2.7m and that account made 1.7m/h (62%), that account probably ran for ~15 hours / day.

 

Breaks are not included in the script paint. So he was botting 152 hours out of the 168 hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bot detection sometimes brainfarts for unknown reason. I've had about 40 accounts doing the same activity with the same template last year, and all but one got banned, as usual, in the first month. One account, surprisingly, kept on going for 8 months straight after all it's clones were long gone.

Some accounts just survive longer than others, and there's no obvious explanation for it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Led Zeppelin said:

They probably get banned the moment th move any gold off the account. 

This is also false. The bot continually mules that sweet GP profit with the help of my automatic Zulrah Muler

https://tribot.org/repository/script/id/2969-w-zulrah-muler/

So when you get back you just have a stack of loot :)

JifTn6a.png

 

4 hours ago, Laniax said:

The runtime might not be a 24/7 thing. Breaks almost certainly happen (and can or can not be counted in the runtime, depending on scripter).

So it might've taken several weeks for that proggy to form.

The runtime does not include breaks ( I subtract it via the code ).

Note however, this user did not take breaks.

 

1 hour ago, ConnorM said:

Pure luck.

That's the answer :P

Pure luck you say?

Then it would be a rare occurrence right?

UmlwSRf.jpg
vABOQLm.jpg
EFjmPa3.png
NcgAymd.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Worthy said:

This is also false. The bot continually mules that sweet GP profit with the help of my automatic Zulrah Muler

https://tribot.org/repository/script/id/2969-w-zulrah-muler/

So when you get back you just have a stack of loot :)

JifTn6a.png

 

The runtime does not include breaks ( I subtract it via the code ).

Note however, this user did not take breaks.

 

Pure luck you say?

Then it would be a rare occurrence right?

UmlwSRf.jpg
vABOQLm.jpg
EFjmPa3.png
NcgAymd.png

Yeah now show all the pictures of the people getting banned within 1 day ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Worthy said:

Here ya go:

eqg7vtD.pngall.png

 

Have you ever seen a cash stack > 10M?

Not saying it's a bad script at all - I'm just saying you're posting the 1% of good proggies out there which have been lucky to last that long. Considering I've seen a lot of people say they got banned within 1-2 days with not doing anywhere close to 24/7

Those people are also running 30-60 bots so I'm really not surprised at the amount of money they've made. 

 

  • thonking 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, ConnorM said:

Not saying it's a bad script at all - I'm just saying you're posting the 1% of good proggies out there which have been lucky to last that long. Considering I've seen a lot of people say they got banned within 1-2 days with not doing anywhere close to 24/7

Those people are also running 30-60 bots so I'm really not surprised at the amount of money they've made. 
 

The point of botting is so people make more money than the account they had was worth, plus the time they put into farming.

Your argument is invalid, because clearly those people have made so much money that they profitted to such an extreme where they farmed hundreds of accounts. Meaning they did not get banned in a reasonable time, and decided to continue farming and make bank, as is shown by the data collected.

Bans occur with all scripts.

Edited by Worthy
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, alfonsobravo said:

@Worthy Reckon it would be do-able to bot a main using your zulrah script (for reasonable hours a day) and survive? 

His scripts are typically top quality with high levels of antiban. 

always weigh the chances of ban vs the gain, only you can decide if the account is worth the risk. 

Edited by Led Zeppelin
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Led Zeppelin said:

His scripts are typically top quality with high levels of antiban. 

Like I said though always weigh the chances of ban vs the gain, only you can decide if the account is worth the risk. 

I'm not gonna go crazy hours, possibly anywhere from 4-8 max. I do bot other things right now only using premium scripts and taking manual breaks, manual legit playing/questing etc in between. I'm aware that this isn't 2013 or 2014 OSRS where you can bot like crazy and not get caught. Thanks for the heads up :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, alfonsobravo said:

I'm not gonna go crazy hours, possibly anywhere from 4-8 max. I do bot other things right now only using premium scripts and taking manual breaks, manual legit playing/questing etc in between. I'm aware that this isn't 2013 or 2014 OSRS where you can bot like crazy and not get caught. Thanks for the heads up :D 

Tbh 2014-2015 was probably heavier on bans than it is now. 

I would say keep each script run not more than a few hours to be safe and switch it up. 

 

Tbh when it comes to people botting on their mains: that’s Jagex’s loss if they ban them; they’d be banning paying customers. There is a reason they had a big rs3 campaign where they told people to appeal their ban, a monthly paycheck is better than banning people who aren’t going to play (and thus pay) legit anyways. 

 

Tl;dr: don’t suicide bot but I think the Chinese overlords are more ‘ok’ with botting because they know (as the people who bot) what it does for the game.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, alfonsobravo said:

@Worthy Reckon it would be do-able to bot a main using your zulrah script (for reasonable hours a day) and survive? 

Honestly I cannot tell you this information because I do not know. All I can say is, do not bot on an account you would not want to lose.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Led Zeppelin said:

Tbh 2014-2015 was probably heavier on bans than it is now. 

I would say keep each script run not more than a few hours to be safe and switch it up. 

 

Tbh when it comes to people botting on their mains: that’s Jagex’s loss if they ban them; they’d be banning paying customers. There is a reason they had a big rs3 campaign where they told people to appeal their ban, a monthly paycheck is better than banning people who aren’t going to play (and thus pay) legit anyways. 

 

Tl;dr: don’t suicide bot but I think the Chinese overlords are more ‘ok’ with botting because they know (as the people who bot) what it does for the game.

Yup I'm also thinking the same thing. Makes sense to their private investor, I feel jagex cares more about accounts that were created purely to goldfarm. 

Gonna stick to my cautious botting, hopefully it turns out well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, alfonsobravo said:

Yup I'm also thinking the same thing. Makes sense to their private investor, I feel jagex cares more about accounts that were created purely to goldfarm. 

Gonna stick to my cautious botting, hopefully it turns out well. 

Yep. Good luck I’m in the same boat! 

 

No botting = I don’t play the game. The game is already 15 years old overall so that’s not something they can have if they want their money back for going to mobile. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • This update features:

      Fixed broken hooks from today's update


      Fix wilderness level with RuneLite (Thanks @Todd)


      Add support for Kotlin .class files in scripts (Thanks @wastedbro)


      Overhaul Inventory API (Thanks @wastedbro)


      Add List support for common methods


      Change method grouping to make more sense (by functionality)


      Refactor methods to utilize Java 8 streams instead of cumbersome loops




      Recognize chatbox minimization (Thanks @JoeDezzy1)


      Fix Screen#isInViewport when NPC chat is open (Thanks @JoeDezzy1)


      Fix login bot bugs (Thanks @erickho123)


      Fix hint arrow return values (Thanks @Encoded)


      Fix depositAllExcept functionality (Thanks @wastedbro)


      Change containing box interface bound and adjust for Y values (Thanks @erickho123)
      • 151 replies
    • This release will:

      Fix prayers and world hopper API (Thanks @JoeDezzy1 and @erickho123)


      Improve banking API (Thanks @Encoded)


      Adds methods for returning and using Java Lists, rather than arrays


      Slightly randomizes some hardcoded behaviour


      Removes sleeps from waitConditions; the efficiency saving potential is negligible in these use-cases, therefore cleaner code is preferable


      Other back-end improvements





      Note: If you are using LG, please restart both the RS client and TRiBot.
      • 90 replies
    • This release will:

      Add new internal framework for capturing exceptions


      Fix issue with not selecting the last column in world hopper (Thanks @Todd)


      Add a message about pin usage in Banking#openBank (Thanks @Todd)


      Disable the firewall by default (Thanks @Todd)


      Fix handling of the welcome screen after login (Thanks @Encoded)


      Fix wrong amount bank withdrawal (Thanks @Encoded)


      Fix Screen#isInViewport


      Fix Game#isInViewport (Thanks @Encoded)


      Call onBreakEnd for ListenerManager Breaking Listeners (Thanks @Encoded)


      Fix Prayer#getPrayerPoints NumberFormatException (Thanks @JoeDezzy1)



      Note: If you are using LG, please restart both the RS client and TRiBot.
      • 28 replies
    • This release will:

      Fix LG for both OSBuddy and RuneLite


      Fix issue where the resizable client isn't able to be made smaller (Thanks @JoeDezzy1)


      Fix detection of the logout game tab when resizable mode and side panels are enabled (Thanks @JoeDezzy1)


      Add initial support for Sentry to allow us to identify and easily debug exceptions happening with all TRiBot users


      Add methods to determine if the bank is actually loaded, and not just the overarching interface (Thanks @wastedbro)



      Upcoming updates:

      Improved CLI support


      Full Sentry support


      Much more
      • 64 replies
    • This release will:

      Fix NPE in Camera API (Thanks @wastedbro)


      Update deposit box interface ids (Thanks @Encoded)


      Add various bank methods (Thanks @wastedbro)


      Banking#getWithdrawXQuantity


      Banking#getDefaultWithdrawQuantity


      Banking#arePlaceholdersOn




      Fix resizeable minimap bug (Thanks @wastedbro)


      Remove Java 8 requirement


      Please note: TRiBot is not yet fully compatible with Java 10+




      Fix the break handler issues by ensuring the break handler thread never gets paused


      Fix broken settings hooks



      Upcoming updates:

      Improved CLI support


      Much more



      Note: If you are using LG, please restart both the RS client and TRiBot
      • 68 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...