Jump to content
Assume

Assume Staker V2 -- X STAKING -- 4 CALCULATORS -- DDS/BOX/WHIP [-2.147b - 2.147B/HR] 40B+ PROFIT

Recommended Posts

Also is the state supposed to say "STARTUP" ? I can't tell if the script is working properly or not for me. Surely it would say "finding stake" or something?

27d5e25dd2c7c96306094bcd02403ab1.png

Can you type the stake values as "1M" or would I have to type "1,000,000" ?

Minimum win chance value do i put 52 or 52% ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mayhs said:

Also is the state supposed to say "STARTUP" ? I can't tell if the script is working properly or not for me. Surely it would say "finding stake" or something?

27d5e25dd2c7c96306094bcd02403ab1.png

Can you type the stake values as "1M" or would I have to type "1,000,000" ?

Minimum win chance value do i put 52 or 52% ?

Startup can take a few minutes. And it doesn't matter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • [22:00:18] Login bot succeeded.
  • [22:00:18] java.lang.NullPointerException
  • [22:00:18] at scripts.assume_staker.staker_api.types.i.(SPlayer.java:55)
  • [22:00:18] at scripts.assume_staker.staker_api.a.a.h(StartupModule.java:55)
  • [22:00:18] at scripts.assume_staker.staker_api.managers.b.h(OverallStateManager.java:35)
  • [22:00:18] at scripts.assume_staker.main.AssumeStaker.run(AssumeStaker.java:54)
  • [22:00:18] at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
  • [22:00:41] Script Ended: Assume Staker.

if disconnected

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, xman said:

Randomly came to check up on Tribot.. Congrats on re-release Assume. I may have to test this one :)

Same, old one was the tits like 3 and a half years ago till all my accounts got banned lol... 

 

I don't know if I feel like investing $500 into accounts being trained from level 3 is my issue right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Diabolic said:

Same, old one was the tits like 3 and a half years ago till all my accounts got banned lol... 

 

I don't know if I feel like investing $500 into accounts being trained from level 3 is my issue right now.

what would you be investing that into if you don't mind me asking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Diabolic said:

Same, old one was the tits like 3 and a half years ago till all my accounts got banned lol... 

 

I don't know if I feel like investing $500 into accounts being trained from level 3 is my issue right now.

$$$$$$$$$

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Diabolic said:

Same, old one was the tits like 3 and a half years ago till all my accounts got banned lol... 

 

I don't know if I feel like investing $500 into accounts being trained from level 3 is my issue right now.

your name rings a bell..but yeah most of my accounts are banned as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/10/2017 at 4:42 AM, Nodemaster said:

what would you be investing that into if you don't mind me asking

I don't have any accounts, and I haven't had much success in botting accounts up, I would pay for a NMZ service for 3 accounts minimum if I was seriously going to do this again.  The stats I would want on the accounts would likely cost close to $500.

 

I have not been around the game in almost 7 months, I have no way to tell if this will be even worth it by the time my accounts are done, but the proggys look insane.

Edited by Diabolic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Diabolic said:

I don't have any accounts, and I haven't had much success in botting accounts up, I would pay for a NMZ service for 3 accounts minimum if I was seriously going to do this again.  The stats I would want on the accounts would likely cost close to $500.

 

I have not been around the game in almost 7 months, I have no way to tell if this will be even worth it by the time my accounts are done, but the proggys look insane.

WYD offers level 3 to 90ish combat stats for like 50m I think. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NeuroGenix said:

So does your new calculator take into consideration each players weapon stats to calculate each players accuracy before simulating thousands of duels or is it some sort of formula again?

There are 4 options. Feel free to test them out with the 1 hour trial. I don't plan on going into specifics of my calculators backend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, jens4626 said:

Is the script able to switch between flick and deflect? This video might be usefull for explanation 

 

Well since this has been released, he used the exact same calculations I used in my staking simulator (for all those people that keep messaging me, this is how it was done; all formulas can be found online).

Unless yours uses these formulas to simulate real duels, which can be done 300,000 times in less than 2 seconds, it isn't accurate.

I would test your calculators but mines not on this laptop so I can't do it today; but it would be simple enough for you to confirm it; its not like you have any other competition on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ridzz said:

URGENT

 

Maybe update related, Bot is not recognising duel challenges anymore may need a client/script update.

Restart Tribot. It's highly unlikely the script will need an update, but Tribot might I can't confirm it right now as I am on vacation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, chachacha said:

So I thought my 60m loss was down to bad luck. However after watching the script for ages, it sometimes doesnt click to attack the player in a duel. This leaves them able to get the first hit almost every time

 

3 hours ago, chachacha said:

@Assume Also man, although it advertises the max/min properly, it accepts duels for higher or lower amounts. 

 

Im currently on 5m max, and it allows to fight for 8m+

Correct. If they bet 8m and the x places you at < 5m, it'll accept the bet. For your first post, I need a video of that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Assume said:

 

Correct. If they bet 8m and the x places you at < 5m, it'll accept the bet. For your first post, I need a video of that. 

At the moment it's set to stake 3m with 1.6x. It's matching people's 8m stakes so seems to be disregarding the maximum bet. 

Video wise, sure I understand. I'll try but I'm currently on 2 hours running time with no stakes so could be tricky. 

Another issues is the it doesn't recognise when it's on the first staking screen. 

If a player challenges myself, then quickly challenges someone else when the bot tries to accept the duel it sends a duel request to the person rather than accepting the duel & going to the interface.

I'm not sure if people are purposely doing it so bots get stuck, but it doesn't recognise it's in the interface so stays there forever 

Last point, sorry for all the questions, just love this script! - I've got it set on 52% win chance. Why it xing people? Someone takes me 3m & the bot offered 2910k. If I've a better chance of winning, why is it allowing xing to x me?

Edited by chachacha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chachacha said:

At the moment it's set to stake 3m with 1.6x. It's matching people's 8m stakes so seems to be disregarding the maximum bet. 

Video wise, sure I understand. I'll try but I'm currently on 2 hours running time with no stakes so could be tricky. 

Another issues is the it doesn't recognise when it's on the first staking screen. 

If a player challenges myself, then quickly challenges someone else when the bot tries to accept the duel it sends a duel request to the person rather than accepting the duel & going to the interface.

I'm not sure if people are purposely doing it so bots get stuck, but it doesn't recognise it's in the interface so stays there forever 

Last point, sorry for all the questions, just love this script! - I've got it set on 52% win chance. Why it xing people? Someone takes me 3m & the bot offered 2910k. If I've a better chance of winning, why is it allowing xing to x me?

I find it hard to believe it's ignoring max bet but I'll take a look. 

 

I have absolutely no idea what you're saying about the 52% thing. If you set it to 52% and you have a 50% chance of winning, it's going to X to 52%. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • This release will:

      Fix key event handling issue


      Fix other event handling issue


      Fix RSServer hook


      Update world hopper to have it use OCR, thanks to Todd


      Use proper disposal of old Graphics objects


      Reformat code


      Rearrange code


      Organize code imports


      Apply around 8000 automated code refactorings


      Make preparations for Java 9


      Fix 11 various bugs


      Add more reliable debugging support


      Fix mouseEntered/Exited event dispatching bug


      Fix minimap walking bug where it opens the map


      Fix broken hooks for today's game update
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 86 replies
    • This update will:

      Fix GE inventory item positioning bug


      Fix broken object hooks
        • Like
      • 27 replies
    • This release will:

      Fix some ClosedChannelException bug


      Fix bug in RSObject#getAllTiles


      Add game tab support for "Kourend Favour"
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • This release will:

      Fix Settings UI placement bug


      Fix game object location bug


      Fix small layout bug making the client shift up and down


      Fix client crashing bug where loading the client with a small display area will cause the client to crash


      Fix annoying Linux bug relating to painting events and peers


      Fix settings saving bug where settings are saved to disk more often than they should


      Fix RSInterface#isBeingDrawn bug affecting a limited amount of people


      Drop Java 1.7 bytecode version for 1.8


      Important: Since the downloadable RS client uses Java 7, it will no longer be compatible with Looking Glass. To make up for this, we will add support for using other clients such as RuneLite (at a later date).


      This change was necessary to allow us to use Java 8 syntax. It also paves the way for Java 9/10/11 support.
        • Like
      • 40 replies
    • This update will:

      Fix the RSMenuNode bug which also fixes the bug with bank opening


      Fix the incorrect object positions bug


      Fix and re-enable the LG Objects API Accelerator


      Fix the RSObject#getAllTiles bug
        • Like
      • 22 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×