Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Buy OSRS Gold

Sell OSRS Gold
Aropupu

[ABCL 10] [ABC2] aAgility v2 [ALL ROOFTOPS]

Recommended Posts

Array
1 hour ago, Underpaw said:

This is so weird. I'm starting the script and it's opening aPlunderer instead O_O

1 hour ago, nykko said:

me too...

1 hour ago, jamamma said:

same here

48 minutes ago, SKYMETAL said:

bought this  a few days ago. works very well, but now whenever i try to start it up its loading aplunder for pyramid plunder and im not sure hwy

39 minutes ago, Mutsuo said:

Same here!!! ( I have premium)

 

11 minutes ago, defile.you said:

Starting my script now opens up plunder.... it was a good script for the whole day it worked i guess ..

Mistakes happen, Accidentally updated the wrong script etc. etc. Should be fixed now.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

having issues with script this morning. i keep getting this 

  • [07:26:21] Disabled all randoms.
  • [07:26:21] Generating script antiban profile...
  • [07:26:23] Antiban profile successfully generated!
  • [07:26:23] java.lang.ClassCastException: obf.on cannot be cast to java.lang.Iterable
  • [07:26:23] at org.tribot.api2007.types.RSCharacter.uo(so:429)
  • [07:26:23] at org.tribot.api2007.types.RSCharacter.isInCombat(so:528)
  • [07:26:23] at scripts.aAgilityNEW.yb.E(ClickingMethods.java:386)
  • [07:26:23] at scripts.aAgilityNEW.yb.A(ClickingMethods.java:175)
  • [07:26:23] at scripts.aAgilityNEW.yb.E(ClickingMethods.java:80)
  • [07:26:23] at scripts.aAgilityNEW.pb.a(Course.java:66)
  • [07:26:23] at scripts.aAgilityNEW.Main.a(Main.java:166)
  • [07:26:23] at scripts.aAgilityNEW.Main.run(Main.java:123)
  • [07:26:23] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
  • [07:26:23] Script Ended: aAgility [PREMIUM].

that shows up right after starting script. it will click on 1 obstacle then shut down

Edited by Thecoolwon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Thecoolwon said:

having issues with script this morning. i keep getting this 

that shows up right after starting script. it will click on 1 obstacle then shut down

Tribot issue after the new update from Trilez. Only happens on looking glass as far as I know. Stop using looking glass or wait for fix. You should also try the steps in  Are you having problems with the script? part of the main post in case those fix the issue. Either way, it's not a script issue so there's nothing I can do about it. The error happens within a Tribot method.

Many others reporting the issue here with any scripts that use the isInCombat method:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Aropupu said:

Tribot issue after the new update from Trilez. Only happens on looking glass as far as I know. Stop using looking glass or wait for fix. You should also try the steps in  Are you having problems with the script? part of the main post in case those fix the issue. Either way, it's not a script issue so there's nothing I can do about it. The error happens within a Tribot method.

Many others reporting the issue here with any scripts that use the isInCombat method:

thanks for the prompt reply as always, i will wait till its fixed as i dont trust not using looking glass. i haven't gotten to try troubleshooting as i am at work currently so i will try once i get home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Started script in LG. Shutdown immediately and got this error.

 

  • [11:37:05] Script Started: aAgility [PREMIUM].
  • [11:37:05] Disabled all randoms.
  • [11:37:05] Generating script antiban profile...
  • [11:37:05] Antiban profile successfully generated!
  • [11:37:06] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.reflect.Method.getParameterCount()I
  • [11:37:06] at obf.so.MS(ou:1389)
  • [11:37:06] at obf.so.GA(ou:2063)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor23.invoke(Unknown Source)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
  • [11:37:06] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.StandardMBeanIntrospector.invokeM2(StandardMBeanIntrospector.java:111)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.StandardMBeanIntrospector.invokeM2(StandardMBeanIntrospector.java:45)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MBeanIntrospector.invokeM(MBeanIntrospector.java:235)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.PerInterface.invoke(PerInterface.java:138)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.MBeanSupport.invoke(MBeanSupport.java:250)
  • [11:37:06] at javax.management.StandardMBean.invoke(StandardMBean.java:405)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:819)
  • [11:37:06] at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:791)
  • [11:37:06] at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl.doOperation(RMIConnectionImpl.java:1447)
  • [11:37:06] at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl.access$200(RMIConnectionImpl.java:89)
  • [11:37:06] at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl$PrivilegedOperation.run(RMIConnectionImpl.java:1292)
  • [11:37:06] at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl.doPrivilegedOperation(RMIConnectionImpl.java:1380)
  • [11:37:06] at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnectionImpl.invoke(RMIConnectionImpl.java:812)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
  • [11:37:06] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:322)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:177)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:174)
  • [11:37:06] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:173)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:553)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:808)
  • [11:37:06] at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:667)
  • [11:37:06] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
  • [11:37:06] at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
  • [11:37:06] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
  • [11:37:06] Script Ended: aAgility [PREMIUM].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Spyder94 said:

Started script in LG. Shutdown immediately and got this error.

  • [11:37:05] Script Started: aAgility [PREMIUM].
  • [11:37:05] Disabled all randoms.
  • [11:37:05] Generating script antiban profile...
  • [11:37:05] Antiban profile successfully generated!
  • [11:37:06] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.lang.reflect.Method.getParameterCount()I

This error has nothing to do with the script. Most likely related to LG. I cannot fix LG errors. Looking Glass is in BETA so it can have issues.

Here's a thread about the same issue, please try the solutions that are provided there:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Temp banned at falador course, ran the script for 1-3 hours a few times over the course of 3-4 days. 
Levelled from 36-55 agility so not exactly suicide botting. 36-40 at varrock, 40-50 at canifis then 50-55 at falador course (changed course manually, didn't use any auto change course options).

 

Levelled 52-55 in a 2 hour  run about 20 hours ago or so. Got home from work now and i was banned (bot was NOT running  and hasn't been since), no idea whether or not i was busted at falador course.
Was not using looking glass since it didn't work when i started (maybe fixed by now, idk).

 

Acc is a 1 year old lvl 60 pure, 750 ish total lvl, around 50 QP, never botted on it before.

Was only running this 1 script on this 1 account, so no way in hell i got busted for anything unrelated to this script.

 

 

My advice is to stay the f away from this script

Edited by Bananan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bananan said:

Temp banned at falador course, ran the script for 1-3 hours a few times over the course of 3-4 days. 
Levelled from 36-55 agility so not exactly suicide botting. 36-40 at varrock, 40-50 at canifis then 50-55 at falador course (changed course manually, didn't use any auto change course options).

 

Levelled 52-55 in a 2 hour  run about 20 hours ago or so. Got home from work now and i was banned (bot was NOT running  and hasn't been since), no idea whether or not i was busted at falador course.
Was not using looking glass since it didn't work when i started (maybe fixed by now, idk).

 

Acc is a 1 year old lvl 60 pure, 750 ish total lvl, around 50 QP, never botted on it before.

Was only running this 1 script on this 1 account, so no way in hell i got busted for anything unrelated to this script.

 

 

My advice is to stay the f away from this script

maybe you should have taken your own advice?

93bf05587d52e5d0432d95b3e9e4db6f.png

Edited by Rapidz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Bananan said:

My advice is to stay the f away from this script

You always take a risk when you bot. It still surprises me that people are not aware of that. Many people have used this script without any issues. The script is built in such a way that you can affect how it works a lot, which can possibly affect ban rate but there's no way to know what settings do and what don't if at all. There are too many factors that can cause bans that it's impossible to have 100% accurate information about what causes them so ban reports are usually quite useless.

Also, you should report your bans in the official ban discussion thread:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, depern said:

Worst anti-ban i've ever seen, worst than free bots... Got banned on 2 accounts within 7 hrs.

worst anti-ban?
It has by far the best custom anti ban on this website ;)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/23/2013 at 0:03 PM, Aropupu said:

affect the script much. Only affects alching while walking (does it start alching before it start walking more often etc.)

62689bf5f5.jpg

 

the script runs perfect, people complaining just do not know how to bot correctly. I've already gotten 99 agility with this script going for number 2. Thanks Aropupu.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Johnfromthecon said:

the final proggy on that long one 

069028b0a9.jpg

Amazing progress report! :)

However, everyone please keep in mind that progress reports can encourage you to bot longer than you should. It's not advised to bot such long periods of time and long progress reports usually include a lot of break and afk times. Always keep your botting to human-like times and don't do sudden changes in behavior while in game.

Edited by Aropupu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5.8.2016 at 3:47 AM, Rapidz said:

maybe you should have taken your own advice?

93bf05587d52e5d0432d95b3e9e4db6f.png

How is that not using the script with extreme caution? The alternative is using the script for an hour a day, which makes the point of botting completely void. Honestly would consider getting 36-55 over 3-4 days being as cautious as anyone can bother being without it being on a main.

On 5.8.2016 at 10:25 AM, Aropupu said:

You always take a risk when you bot. It still surprises me that people are not aware of that. Many people have used this script without any issues. The script is built in such a way that you can affect how it works a lot, which can possibly affect ban rate but there's no way to know what settings do and what don't if at all. There are too many factors that can cause bans that it's impossible to have 100% accurate information about what causes them so ban reports are usually quite useless.

Lol, what makes you think i didn't know that? I botted on the user because i couldn't give a crap whether or not it got banned, but i did and it was by botting way safer than i have ever done before over the last 6 years.

 

My point is that if i got banned for getting close to diddly squat over several days, then your script is completely useless in practice and shouldn't be used by anyone, let alone for 7 bucks a month or whatever you're charging now, which was the point of my post, not whinging my noob account getting temped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bananan said:

How is that not using the script with extreme caution? The alternative is using the script for an hour a day, which makes the point of botting completely void. Honestly would consider getting 36-55 over 3-4 days being as cautious as anyone can bother being without it being on a main.

Lol, what makes you think i didn't know that? I botted on the user because i couldn't give a crap whether or not it got banned, but i did and it was by botting way safer than i have ever done before over the last 6 years.

 

My point is that if i got banned for getting close to diddly squat over several days, then your script is completely useless in practice and shouldn't be used by anyone, let alone for 7 bucks a month or whatever you're charging now, which was the point of my post, not whinging my noob account getting temped.

You ignored every point I told you. Please take this discussion to the ban discussion thread. There you can discuss with others about your views on bans. Script threads are not for extended ban discussion. I don't mind reporting bans but if you want to continue your arguing, please go to the official ban discussion thread, thank you.

 

Edited by Aropupu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Bananan said:

How is that not using the script with extreme caution? The alternative is using the script for an hour a day, which makes the point of botting completely void. Honestly would consider getting 36-55 over 3-4 days being as cautious as anyone can bother being without it being on a main.

Lol, what makes you think i didn't know that? I botted on the user because i couldn't give a crap whether or not it got banned, but i did and it was by botting way safer than i have ever done before over the last 6 years.

 

My point is that if i got banned for getting close to diddly squat over several days, then your script is completely useless in practice and shouldn't be used by anyone, let alone for 7 bucks a month or whatever you're charging now, which was the point of my post, not whinging my noob account getting temped.

Just saying, I have personally gotten 99 twice with this script, and i am currently working on my third. I run my bot for 8-12 hours per day, EVERY DAY, and I have yet to be banned. It takes about 45 days to get 99, and I run it every single day of that span. This is THE BEST script I have ever used, and I have got to say that aMiner is a close second as i am currently 86/99 mining as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Our picks

    • Over the past few months, I’ve been working diligently on a new project - TRiBot X. Everything has been written from the ground up, with all of the best practices of software engineering. Every aspect of TRiBot has been re-imagined to support three main goals: flexibility, useability, and reliability.
        • Like
      • 50 replies
    • Come give us feedback on the next version of TRiBot!
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 86 replies
    • TRiBot is looking to improve a lot of its customer relationship management, customer on boarding process, customer experience, design elements, community engagement and pretty much everything else you can imagine when it comes to marketing.

      Our goal: To ensure that the marketing done TRULY reflects the experience and does not shine an inaccurate light on what TRiBot is lacking in.

      So I ask, what do you love about TRiBot and what do you hate about TRiBot? What does O S Bot, Rune M8, PowR Bot and Dre amBot do better? (yes I purposely didn't spell it right 😂).

      Love, 

      RileyZ
        • Like
      • 25 replies
    • Over the last three weeks, I've been working on upgrading our server infrastructure. It's finally ready and is now live!

      Why?

      Increased reliability - less server errors


      Increased availability - less downtime


      Increased security - keeping us and you secure


      Increased capacity - ability to serve you better


      Increased speed - less waiting for things to load


      Faster development - server and service updates will come faster


      What are the changes?

      Move from a single AWS EC2 instance to AWS ECS (Elastic Container Service)


      Distributed computing


      Load balancing


      Git management of server files and filesystem


      Redis caching


      How?

      AWS ECS (with 10 EC2 instances)


      AWS ElastiCache (Redis)


      AWS Load Balancing


      AWS EFS (Elastic file system)


      Please bare with us as I continue to tune the server for maximum performance. Slow loading speeds may occur temporarily. I thank everyone for their patience.

      Please post on this thread if you experience any issues other than slow loading times.
        • Like
      • 51 replies
    • This release will:

      Fix prayers and world hopper API (Thanks @JoeDezzy1 and @erickho123)


      Improve banking API (Thanks @Encoded)


      Adds methods for returning and using Java Lists, rather than arrays


      Slightly randomizes some hardcoded behaviour


      Removes sleeps from waitConditions; the efficiency saving potential is negligible in these use-cases, therefore cleaner code is preferable


      Other back-end improvements





      Note: If you are using LG, please restart both the RS client and TRiBot.
        • Sad
        • Haha
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 90 replies
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...