Welcome to TRiBot Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback


Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About sedgy

  • Rank
  • Birthday 02/20/1996


  • Sex
  • Location
    United Kingdom
  1. I did this but i still get the message "Could not load human mouse data. Reason: unable to download human mouse data" I had all the human mouse data code in a notepad file on my desktop. I've moved that to the Local Scripts folder but no luck.
  2. A few months ago i was having trouble with the human mouse and my private script. So, instead of deleting it, i moved it out, onto my desktop. I want to be able to use it again now, but i'm unsure where the file needs to go? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
  3. @element_purple Got it. Thanks for the help, i really appreciate it! Didn't realise i had to use osbuddy!
  4. @fatdoobie2 @element_purple Are you guys still successfully using looking glass? I have set everything up as suggested, however, once i get runescape up in a webpage and load looking glass, it just sits on "Looking for Runescape Client" indefinitely. Is this to do with the recent DDOS attacks on runescape themselves? Or just a bug in the current client? Any help would be appreciated greatly!
  5. This works, however, that's where my private script goes!
  6. All good, thanks for the reply
  7. To sum it up, I botted about 3 months ago with mixed success, made some decent money and had a private script created. However, after using it for a week or two I started a full time job (and also received an "across the board" goldfarming ban). I tried a couple of times to get a farm up and running again but couldn't commit the time to it. Now, with university (and all the costs that come with it) an ever in-pending issue, I've decided i could really do with some extra income from botting, even if it is minimal. I've heard talk of a new botting measure called "looking glass" and multiple people claim that it has drastically reduced ban rates for them. I have also read that the current beta version is available to VIP-E members, is this still the case? Any further information about looking glass would be appreciated as my knowledge on it is pretty sparse.
  8. I need help setting up Tor with Tribot. I was interested in the service offered by @idc but he has been busy and hasn't gotten back to me. Here is the thread ---> https://tribot.org/forums/topic/40463-%E2%8C%A0-tor-with-tribot-service-%E2%8C%A1%E2%8C%A0-free-constant-ip-changing-%E2%8C%A1%E2%8C%A0-one-time-setup-fee-%E2%8C%A1/ If anyone can show me how to set this all up AND add additional ports, i would be happy to pay. If you can do this, please post below! Thanks.
  9. Level 1 should just be a warning sign to make other users aware. Level 2 should be restricted use of the market. Level 3 should be total restriction from the market.
  10. Agree with this too. Personally, the second option looks the most sensible. Having restriction in varying degrees, dependent on the offence. Whether it is offsite or not shouldn't matter. If there is solid proof they are a scammer and are likely to do it again, they should be restricted from the market regardless.
  11. @Flamo353 This guy had a good idea. Seriously though, a TWC (trade with caution) is not good enough for someone who has charged back around $2000, even if it's "not on your turf". I fully support a change in the way market restrictions work.
  12. Do you know how the 4790 compares in regards to botting? I've been told it could hit 30 bots, but i'd certainly not be happy with less than 20 to be honest.
  13. Not going to lie, i would be really disappointed with 8-9 accounts, i mean come on, it's £570 with no monitor. My laptop with an i3 and 6gb RAM runs 5 before the CPU starts to struggle, with RAM left spare. I hear people with an AMD fx 8350 with 8GB RAM are running 20 without any significant fps reduction. I can get that for around £400-450, so would hope to be hitting 30 bots with the i7 4790 and 16GB RAM. Mute, when you say minimum of 15-20, does that mean you'd be seeing significant fps reduction by say 25?
  14. @Mute Like i said though, i have no idea about components? For example there are hundreds of different RAMs and i don't know the difference. All i know is the size (8/16gb) and the frequency (1333/1600mhz). Plus i don't have a clue which motherboard would be compatible with which which cpu or RAM. I've looked on pcpartpicker before and feel totally out of my depth. I don't think i could build a computer on there.
  15. The computer is being bought for botting. The reason i have chosen pre-built computers over building one myself is due to my lack of in depth knowledge regarding computer components in general. 1. http://www.costco.co.uk/view/product/uk_catalog/cos_1,cos_1.2,cos_1.2.1/169582 2. http://www.costco.co.uk/view/product/uk_catalog/cos_1,cos_1.2,cos_1.2.1/169575 3. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Intel-I7-4790-Quad-Core-Fast-Office-Home-Multimedia-Pc-Windows7-1Tb-16Gb-ZT3-/141122891428?pt=UK_Computing_DesktopPCs&hash=item20db946ea4 4. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/INTEL-I7-4770-4-CORE-3-4GHZ-16GB-500GB-HD-PC-NEW-WIN-7-1GB-210-GRAPHICS-/400565554622?pt=UK_Computing_DesktopPCs&hash=item5d43914dbe which one? Bare in mind the criteria below. As i am spending ~£600 I want to run about 30 bots if possible, without much/any lagging and reduced performance of the bot client. I hear 8gb RAM is capable of running around 20 bots, for this reason, i would probably look to upgrade the 8gb models listed to 16gb. I feel i'm almost there but just need a little more help making the final decision. If none of these builds are capable of comfortably running 30 bots, please tell me so.